WARDS & MARKETS
The Central Five Wards Ranked: Price/sqm, Yield, and Liquidity Side by Side
A licensed Tokyo real estate professional ranks Minato, Chiyoda, Chuo, Shibuya & Shinjuku wards on price per sqm, gross yield, and exit liquidity for foreign…
On this page 7
TL;DR Minato leads on prestige and capital appreciation runway. Chuo (Tsukishima pocket) leads on accessible entry and liquidity. Shinjuku (Kagurazaka) offers the best yield inside a premium address. Chiyoda’s Bansho is for capital preservation. Shibuya splits — Ebisu works for income, Shoto is a trophy holding. This issue lays out the comparison directly.
I get the same question roughly three times a week: “If I had ¥50M / ¥100M / ¥200M, where would you put it?” The answer depends on your objectives. But the comparison across wards is something every serious buyer should see in one place.
Price per sqm comparison across the central five wards
Directional ranges for resale apartments in investment-grade neighborhoods within each ward. Not the cheapest pockets, not the trophy outliers.
| Ward | Submarket | Price/sqm (resale) |
|---|---|---|
| Minato | Azabu, Minami-Azabu | ~¥1.8M – ¥2.8M |
| Minato | Roppongi, Akasaka | ~¥1.4M – ¥2.3M |
| Chiyoda | Bansho, Kojimachi | ~¥1.5M – ¥2.2M |
| Chiyoda | Kanda | ~¥0.9M – ¥1.3M |
| Chuo | Nihonbashi | ~¥1.2M – ¥1.8M |
| Chuo | Tsukishima, Kachidoki | ~¥0.9M – ¥1.4M |
| Shibuya | Daikanyama, Shoto | ~¥1.4M – ¥2.0M |
| Shibuya | Ebisu | ~¥1.3M – ¥1.9M |
| Shinjuku | Kagurazaka, Yotsuya | ~¥1.2M – ¥1.8M |
| Shinjuku | Ichigaya, Gyoenmae | ~¥1.0M – ¥1.5M |
Minato’s floor is higher than every other ward’s floor. The gap between Minato’s ceiling and Tsukishima’s floor is almost 3x. That spread is the entire risk-return spectrum of central Tokyo in one column.
From the desk — The question I field most weeks is some version of ‘I have this much, where do you put it’ and the honest answer is always that yield and price sit on a see-saw in these five wards. The buyers I watch hesitate are almost always the ones anchored on headline gross yield, who forget that a Tsukishima 4.5 percent and an Azabu 2.8 percent live in different universes once management cost, tax, and vacancy come out. Across years of these conversations, the ones who run the full net model instead of the gross number are the ones who do not regret the purchase.
Gross yield comparison across the five wards
Directional ranges based on typical well-managed resale apartment units. New builds and trophy outliers excluded.
| Ward / Submarket | Gross Yield Range |
|---|---|
| Minato — Azabu, Minami-Azabu | ~2.4 – 3.2% |
| Minato — Roppongi / Akasaka | ~2.8 – 3.8% |
| Minato — Studio / small units | ~3.5 – 4.5% |
| Chiyoda — Bansho, Kojimachi | ~2.5 – 3.2% |
| Chiyoda — Kanda | ~3.8 – 5.0% |
| Chuo — Nihonbashi | ~2.8 – 3.8% |
| Chuo — Tsukishima / Kachidoki | ~3.5 – 4.8% |
| Shibuya — Daikanyama, Shoto | ~2.6 – 3.5% |
| Shibuya — Ebisu | ~3.2 – 4.0% |
| Shinjuku — Kagurazaka, Yotsuya | ~3.2 – 4.2% |
| Shinjuku — Ichigaya, Gyoenmae | ~3.8 – 4.8% |
The yield hierarchy is almost perfectly inverse to price. That’s efficient markets working. The premium you pay for Azabu is directly subtracted from your yield. Whether that premium is justified by appreciation and stability is the core investment judgment.
Which Tokyo central ward has the best exit liquidity?
Liquidity — how quickly and at what haircut you can sell — matters most when you need to exit under pressure.
Highest liquidity (easiest exit):
Chuo Ward’s tower market (Tsukishima, Kachidoki) leads. Standardized floor plans, abundant comparables, deep domestic buyer pool, and sub-¥100M ticket sizes mean units transact regularly. Expect 60–90 days for a well-priced listing.
Minato Ward’s smaller units (studios and 1LDK under ¥60M) are similarly liquid — driven by investment demand, rental yield seekers, and corporate housing buyers. They move fast.
Moderate liquidity:
Shinjuku Ward’s Kagurazaka and Yotsuya stock. Strong demand but thinner comparable pool than tower markets. 90–150 days is realistic for a well-priced unit.
Shibuya Ward’s Ebisu and Daikanyama. Lifestyle premium attracts motivated buyers but the market is smaller. End-user demand (owner-occupiers) supplements investor demand.
Lowest liquidity (requires patience):
Chiyoda Ward’s Bansho. The thin supply that supports prices works against you on exit. Buyers for ¥100M+ Bansho apartments are rare and deliberate. Marketing periods of 6+ months are not unusual.
Minato Ward’s large-format units (¥150M+, 3LDK, older buildings) similarly face a limited buyer pool.
How do the five wards compare on capital appreciation history?
Based on official land price publications and resale index trends:
All five wards participated in the 2013–2024 price cycle, driven by Abenomics low rates, inbound foreign investment, and yen depreciation effects. Approximate residential price appreciation (yen terms, 2013–2024):
- Minato — strongest in absolute terms (residential land up roughly 70–100%)
- Shibuya — strong, led by commercial overlay and lifestyle brand
- Chiyoda — steady, supported by government anchor and low supply
- Chuo — variable; Nihonbashi outperformed; waterfront had supply headwinds
- Shinjuku — solid in Kagurazaka and Yotsuya; lagged in entertainment districts
This ranking roughly mirrors the prestige order. Higher starting prices produced higher absolute gains — but not necessarily higher percentage returns. Kanda in Chiyoda and Tsukishima in Chuo produced strong percentage gains from lower bases.
What kind of investor suits which ward?
Minato Ward: Long-hold capital preservation buyers, foreign wealth management clients, buyers prioritizing global brand and currency optionality. Not for yield-seekers without significant capital.
Chiyoda Ward: Conservative institutional buyers, private wealth with ultra-long hold horizons (Bansho). Kanda suits yield-focused buyers who want a Chiyoda address at a fraction of the cost.
Chuo Ward: Yield-focused buyers who want central Tokyo exposure with accessible entry. Tower investors who understand the standard Tsukishima product and need liquidity. Development-story buyers in Nihonbashi.
Shibuya Ward: Lifestyle-adjacent investors, foreign buyers who plan mixed personal-use and rental, buyers targeting French or international expat tenant pools. Shoto for trophy allocation.
Shinjuku Ward: Cash-flow investors who need yield without leaving the central wards. Kagurazaka for the yield-with-charm combination. Ichigaya for maximum income at lowest price per sqm inside the premium geography.
Where this ranking goes wrong
Yield figures mask management costs. A 4.5% gross in Tsukishima and a 2.8% gross in Azabu have completely different net yield profiles after tax, management fees, and vacancy. Run full cost models, not headline gross.
“Central” is relative. All five wards are central by Tokyo standards. But within each ward, the investment-grade pockets are specific streets and building types. “I bought in Shinjuku Ward” covers a huge range of quality. The ward label is a start, not an endpoint.
Liquidity rankings can shift. The Harumi supply injection changed Chuo Ward’s tower liquidity temporarily. New development in other wards could do the same. These are current-condition observations, not permanent rankings.
FAQ
If I have ¥30M, which ward can I actually enter? Tsukishima (Chuo Ward) and Kanda (Chiyoda Ward) are the most realistic central Tokyo options at ¥30M. You’re looking at older 1R or 1K studios. For a proper 1LDK investment, ¥40–50M is the more realistic floor in these submarkets.
Which ward is best for foreign buyer resale value? Minato Ward has the most globally recognizable brand. If your end buyers are foreign, Azabu and Roppongi are the easiest stories to tell in English. For domestic Japanese buyer resale, Tsukishima and Kagurazaka have deeper pools.
Do the five wards correlate in price movements? Broadly yes — they move together in major cycles. They diverge on submarket-specific stories. Nihonbashi’s regeneration premium is not correlated with Kabukicho’s price volatility. Diversifying across wards reduces single-area risk.
Is there a ward that combines good yield and good appreciation? No single ward delivers both reliably. Shinjuku (Kagurazaka, Ichigaya) comes closest — yield above 3.5% with solid appreciation track record and supply constraint. The most balanced option in the central five for investors who don’t want to choose one thesis.
How do I compare buildings within the same ward? Price per sqm is the most honest comparator across different building sizes. Layer on: building age (post-2000 preferred), management reserve balance, vacancy rate at time of sale, and the specific submarket within the ward. Ward is the starting filter, not the investment decision.
A separate piece leaves the central five and goes large — Setagaya Ward, Tokyo’s most populated ward and its most family-loved residential market.
